Addressing Stakeholder Concerns About Product Quality
In Scrum, it is crucial to address stakeholder concerns promptly to ensure the product meets their expectations and maintains high quality. When a key stakeholder expresses dissatisfaction with the product quality, the Scrum Master must take appropriate actions to resolve the issue and improve the product.
Exam Question
Several Sprints into a project, the Product Owner tells the Scrum Master that a key stakeholder just started using the product. The stakeholder is unhappy with the quality of the product. What are two good options for the Scrum Master? (choose the best two answers)
- A. Coach the Product Owner on how to talk with the Developers about this concern.
- B. Explain to the Product Owner that it’s up to the Developers to decide on acceptable quality standards.
- C. Encourage the Product Owner to put quality specifications on the Product Backlog and express the stakeholder’s concern to the Developers.
- D. Wait to bring this up until the Sprint Retrospective.
- E. Bring the concern to the testers to improve how the Product is verified.
Correct Answers
A. Coach the Product Owner on how to talk with the Developers about this concern.
C. Encourage the Product Owner to put quality specifications on the Product Backlog and express the stakeholder’s concern to the Developers.
Explanation
Why A and C are Correct
A. Coach the Product Owner on how to talk with the Developers about this concern:
The Scrum Master’s role includes coaching the Product Owner on effective communication and collaboration with the Developers. By guiding the Product Owner on how to address quality concerns with the Developers, the Scrum Master ensures that the team can collectively work on improving the product quality. This action fosters a collaborative environment and encourages open communication.
C. Encourage the Product Owner to put quality specifications on the Product Backlog and express the stakeholder’s concern to the Developers:
Adding quality specifications to the Product Backlog ensures that these concerns are prioritized and addressed in upcoming Sprints. By communicating the stakeholder’s concerns to the Developers, the Scrum Master helps the team understand the importance of quality and integrate it into their work processes. This approach aligns with the Scrum framework’s emphasis on continuous improvement and stakeholder satisfaction.
Why B, D, and E are Incorrect
B. Explain to the Product Owner that it’s up to the Developers to decide on acceptable quality standards: While Developers play a key role in maintaining quality, it is a collaborative effort involving the entire Scrum Team, including the Product Owner. Quality standards should be discussed and agreed upon by the whole team.
D. Wait to bring this up until the Sprint Retrospective: Waiting until the Sprint Retrospective delays addressing the issue and can lead to further dissatisfaction. Immediate action is required to ensure the product quality meets stakeholder expectations.
E. Bring the concern to the testers to improve how the Product is verified: Quality is a collective responsibility of the entire Scrum Team, not just the testers. Addressing the issue within the whole team ensures a holistic approach to quality improvement.
Key Points
- Collaborative Communication: The Scrum Master should facilitate effective communication between the Product Owner and Developers.
- Prioritizing Quality: Quality specifications should be integrated into the Product Backlog and addressed in upcoming Sprints.
Responsibilities in Scrum
- Product Owner: Ensures the Product Backlog is ordered and refined to maximize value and align with the team’s capacity.
- Scrum Master: Facilitates Scrum events, removes impediments, and helps teams adhere to Scrum principles.
- Developers: Plan, manage, and execute all tasks necessary to deliver a potentially shippable Increment, ensuring quality and adherence to the Definition of Done.
Relevance to the PSM I Exam
Understanding how to address stakeholder concerns and improve product quality is crucial for the PSM I exam. This knowledge emphasizes the importance of collaborative communication and continuous improvement within the Scrum framework.
Conclusion
When a key stakeholder expresses dissatisfaction with product quality, the Scrum Master should coach the Product Owner on how to communicate these concerns to the Developers and encourage adding quality specifications to the Product Backlog. This approach ensures that the team addresses quality issues promptly and maintains a high standard of product quality.
For comprehensive preparation and practice exams, check out PSM I Exam Prep to enhance your understanding and application of Scrum principles.

Get ready for the official PSM I exam
480 PSM I practice questions, each with an in-depth explanation like the one above.
- Practice Mode: study at your own pace and choose the test length.
- Mock Exam Mode: 80 random questions in 60 minutes, like the real exam.
$29 is ScrumPrep's one-time price. The official PSM I exam fee ($200) is paid separately to Scrum.org.
More PSM I exam questions
- What techniques could the Scrum Master use when the Scrum Team gets caught in an internal disagreement about which agile practices to apply?
- The Developers ask their Product Owner to re-order the Product Backlog. The team is waiting for an external supplier to deliver a component. Without that component there will not be enough work in the next Sprint to occupy the full team. As the Scrum Master, what advice would you give the Product Owner?
- During Sprint Planning the Product Owner and the Developers are unable to reach an understanding about the highest order Product Backlog items. Because of this, the Developers are unable to determine how many Product Backlog items they can forecast for the upcoming Sprint. However, the Product Owner and the Developers are able to agree on a Sprint Goal.
- What tactic should a Scrum Team use to divide a group of 100 people into multiple Scrum Teams?
- You are the Scrum Master of a new, to be developed product. Development is going to require 45 people. What is a good first question for you to suggest the group thinks about when forming into teams?
