Understanding Resource Allocation in Scrum
The idea that adding more resources to a project will proportionally increase the value delivered is a common misconception. This article explores the relationship between resource allocation and value delivery in Scrum, providing detailed explanations and insights relevant to the PSM II exam.
Exam Question
True or False: Using Scrum ensures that adding more resources to a product delivery effort proportionally increases the value delivered.
- A. True
- B. False
Correct Answer
B. False
Explanation
Correct Answer
B. False: Adding more resources to a product delivery effort does not necessarily lead to a proportional increase in value delivered. In Scrum, the focus is on creating cross-functional, self-managing teams that can deliver valuable Increments of product each Sprint. Simply adding more people or resources can lead to increased complexity, communication overhead, and coordination issues, which may actually slow down progress and reduce efficiency.
Key Points
- Team Dynamics: Adding more members to a Scrum Team can disrupt existing team dynamics and lead to issues with communication and collaboration. Teams need time to integrate new members effectively.
- Diminishing Returns: There is a concept of diminishing returns when adding resources. Beyond a certain point, adding more resources can yield less incremental value.
- Focus on Value: Scrum emphasizes delivering value through effective prioritization and collaboration rather than merely increasing resources. The Product Owner is responsible for maximizing the value of the product through effective Product Backlog management.
Responsibilities in Scrum
- Product Owner: Manages the Product Backlog, prioritizes items based on value, and ensures that the team is focused on delivering the highest value items first.
- Scrum Master: Facilitates Scrum events, removes impediments, and coaches the team on Scrum practices to ensure they are working effectively and efficiently.
- Developers: Collaborate to deliver potentially shippable Increments each Sprint. They focus on maintaining high quality and continuous improvement rather than simply increasing the number of resources.
Relevance to the PSM II Exam
Understanding the impact of resource allocation on value delivery is crucial for the PSM II exam. It demonstrates advanced knowledge of Scrum practices and the ability of the Scrum Master to guide the team in effective resource management. Mastering this concept ensures that Scrum Masters can support their teams in delivering high-quality products without falling into the trap of thinking that more resources always lead to more value.
Key Takeaways
- Adding more resources does not proportionally increase the value delivered in Scrum.
- Effective resource management focuses on team dynamics, collaboration, and prioritization of high-value work.
- The roles within Scrum are designed to maximize efficiency and value delivery through collaboration and continuous improvement.
Conclusion
In Scrum, the focus is on delivering value through effective team collaboration and prioritization, not merely by adding more resources. Understanding this principle is crucial for effective Scrum implementation and success in the PSM II exam.

Get ready for the official PSM II exam
90 PSM II practice questions, each with an in-depth explanation like the one above.
- Practice Mode: study at your own pace and choose the test length.
- Mock Exam Mode: 30 random questions in 90 minutes, like the real exam.
$29 is ScrumPrep's one-time price. The official PSM II exam fee ($250) is paid separately to Scrum.org.
More PSM II exam questions
- After some small experiments with Scrum, your company decides to do a complete project with Scrum. As Scrum Master you have been invited to the “project kick-off meeting” with IT and product management.
- Another team’s Scrum Master seeks your advice. The Daily Scrum always runs longer than 15 minutes. The Developers suggest splitting the Scrum Team into two teams. What is your response?
- You are a Scrum Master for a Scrum Team and one of the developers approaches you and says: Every Sprint we are not completing regression testing for all of the selected Product Backlog items in the Sprint. Regression testing is part of the Definition of Done. We have discussed with the Product Owner and decided to change the Definition of Done to remove regression testing.
- A multi-national company is using Scrum for product development of their five major products. What are two good alternatives for how many Product Owners the company should use for these five products?
- Your organization has announced a release to its user base three Sprints from now. To be able to include all functionality in the release, work needs to accelerate. The Product Owner puts some testing from the Definition of Done on hold for the next three Sprints, while adding a generic item to the Product Backlog to resolve this in a future release.
