Handling Stakeholder Feedback on Product Backlog Ordering
Effectively managing stakeholder feedback on Product Backlog ordering is crucial for ensuring alignment with the product’s strategic goals and delivering maximum value.
Exam Question
A stakeholder pulls the Product Owner aside and questions how they have decided to order the Product Backlog. What is the best response?
(choose the best answer)
A. Tell them to come to the Sprint Retrospective to discuss the issue.
B. Center the conversation on the Product Goal and its value proposition.
C. Ignore their feedback.
D. Change the order of the Product Backlog with the stakeholder feedback in mind.
Correct Answer
B. Center the conversation on the Product Goal and its value proposition.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B. Center the conversation on the Product Goal and its value proposition:
When a stakeholder questions the ordering of the Product Backlog, the best approach is to center the conversation on the Product Goal and its value proposition. This ensures that the discussion remains focused on delivering maximum value and aligns with the strategic objectives of the product. By explaining how the backlog items contribute to achieving the Product Goal, the Product Owner can provide a rationale for the ordering decisions that reflect the overall strategy and priorities.
Why the Other Options Are Less Appropriate
A. Tell them to come to the Sprint Retrospective to discuss the issue:
The Sprint Retrospective is an internal Scrum Team event aimed at inspecting and adapting the team’s processes and practices. It is not the appropriate venue for discussing the ordering of the Product Backlog with stakeholders, as it focuses on team improvements rather than backlog prioritization.
C. Ignore their feedback:
Ignoring stakeholder feedback can lead to dissatisfaction and a lack of trust. Stakeholders play a crucial role in providing insights and feedback that can help improve the product. It is important to address their concerns and explain the rationale behind decisions.
D. Change the order of the Product Backlog with the stakeholder feedback in mind:
While stakeholder feedback is valuable, changing the order of the Product Backlog solely based on a single stakeholder’s input without considering the Product Goal and overall strategy can disrupt the prioritization process. The Product Owner should consider all feedback but align decisions with the Product Goal and value proposition.
Benefits of Centering the Conversation on the Product Goal
- Alignment: Ensures that all discussions are aligned with the strategic objectives of the product.
- Transparency: Provides a clear rationale for backlog ordering decisions, fostering transparency and trust.
- Focus: Keeps the focus on delivering the highest value to customers and stakeholders.
Relevance to the PSPBM Skills Exam
Understanding how to handle stakeholder feedback on Product Backlog ordering is crucial for the PSPBM Skills exam. This knowledge demonstrates the ability to manage the Product Backlog effectively while maintaining alignment with the Product Goal and value proposition.
Key Takeaways
- Centering conversations on the Product Goal ensures alignment with strategic objectives.
- Transparency and clear rationale for decisions foster trust and satisfaction among stakeholders.
- Effective backlog management involves considering feedback but aligning it with the overall strategy.
Conclusion
Handling stakeholder feedback on Product Backlog ordering by centering the conversation on the Product Goal and its value proposition is essential for maintaining alignment and delivering maximum value.

Get ready for the official PSPBM exam
140+ PSPBM practice questions, each with an in-depth explanation like the one above.
- Practice Mode: study at your own pace and choose the test length.
- Mock Exam Mode: 20 random questions in 30 minutes, like the real exam.
$29 is ScrumPrep's one-time price. The official PSPBM exam fee ($200) is paid separately to Scrum.org.
More PSPBM exam questions
- What is the benefit of using a simple naming convention for Product Backlog items rather than using levels of decomposition?
- Who should attend Product Backlog refinement sessions?
- Which of the following is NOT good practice for managing the Product Backlog?
- A Scrum Team has had four Sprint Reviews where the stakeholders are not able to effectively share their opinions. What is likely to be a result of this situation?
- What is the recommended approach for ordering items in the Product Backlog?
