Answering: “During Iteration Planning, the Product Owner (PO) introduces a new story to the team. They cannot come to a consensus on the size of the new story and ask the PO for more details. After a lot of discussion, multiple dependencies with other teams emerge, so the team decides to leave the story in the Team Backlog and not commit. Is the team’s response an anti-pattern?”

During Iteration Planning, the Product Owner (PO) introduces a new story to the team. They cannot come to a consensus on the size of the new story and ask the PO for more details. After a lot of discussion, multiple dependencies with other teams emerge, so the team decides to leave the story in the Team Backlog and not commit. Is the team’s response an anti-pattern?
A. No; the PO provided details on the story.
B. No; the Developers left the story in the Team Backlog for further refinement with the PO.
C. Yes; the Developers identified multiple dependencies with other teams.
D. Yes; the PO and the Developers reached a planning session without preparation and the dependencies were not identified.
E. Yes; the PO should not be in the iteration planning meeting.

Answering: “During Iteration Planning, the Product Owner (PO) introduces a new story to the team. They cannot come to a consensus on the size of the new story and ask the PO for more details. After a lot of discussion, multiple dependencies with other teams emerge, so the team decides to leave the story in the Team Backlog and not commit. Is the team’s response an anti-pattern?” Read More »

You cannot copy content of this page

$35 Exam Preps

Sale Ending Soon

Day
Hour
Min
Sec
Offer Expired
Add Your Heading Text Here