Empowering Scrum Teams in Hiring Decisions
Empowering Scrum Teams to make decisions about their composition can enhance their sense of ownership, improve team dynamics, and increase productivity. This article discusses the best approach to handle a Scrum Team’s request to add new Developers.
Exam Question
You manage a product development organization. A Scrum Team comes to you with a request to add two more Developers to the Scrum Team in order to increase their capacity to get work done. You have budget and headcount. The Scrum Team’s case is compelling, and they have a good track record for delivering and making good decisions. In response to the Scrum Team’s request, you decide to:
(choose the best answer)
A. Let the Scrum Team screen candidates, and pass candidates to you to interview and make the final hiring decision.
B. Ask the Scrum Team to write a job description. You will handle the initial screening and pass along passing candidates to the team, who conduct their own interviews and make the final decision.
C. Give the Scrum Team budgetary boundaries, but let them recruit, interview, and hire their own new team members, with the help from a partner in Human Resources.
Correct Answer
C. Give the Scrum Team budgetary boundaries, but let them recruit, interview, and hire their own new team members, with the help from a partner in Human Resources.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C. Give the Scrum Team budgetary boundaries, but let them recruit, interview, and hire their own new team members, with the help from a partner in Human Resources:
This approach empowers the Scrum Team to take ownership of their composition, which can enhance team cohesion and ensure that new members align well with the existing team dynamics. Providing budgetary boundaries ensures that the team understands the constraints within which they must operate, promoting responsible decision-making. Involving Human Resources as a partner ensures that the recruitment process adheres to organizational policies and procedures.
Incorrect Answers
A. Let the Scrum Team screen candidates, and pass candidates to you to interview and make the final hiring decision:
While this approach involves the team in the screening process, it retains final decision-making power with the manager, which can undermine the team’s sense of ownership and empowerment.
B. Ask the Scrum Team to write a job description. You will handle the initial screening and pass along passing candidates to the team, who conduct their own interviews and make the final decision:
This approach provides a balanced involvement but still limits the team’s control over the initial screening process. Full empowerment requires the team to be involved in all aspects of recruitment, from job description to final hiring.
Agile Leadership Insights
- Team Empowerment: Empowering Scrum Teams to make decisions about their composition enhances their sense of ownership and responsibility.
- Collaboration with HR: Involving Human Resources ensures that the recruitment process complies with organizational standards and policies.
- Budgetary Constraints: Providing budgetary boundaries helps teams make responsible decisions while ensuring they understand and respect organizational constraints.
Relevance to the PAL I Exam
Understanding the importance of empowering Scrum Teams in recruitment decisions is crucial for the PAL I exam. This knowledge demonstrates the ability to foster self-managing teams and enhance team dynamics.
Key Takeaways
- Empowering Scrum Teams to make recruitment decisions enhances their sense of ownership and team cohesion.
- Collaboration with Human Resources ensures compliance with organizational policies.
- Providing budgetary boundaries promotes responsible decision-making within the team.
Conclusion
Empowering Scrum Teams to recruit and hire their own members within budgetary boundaries, with the support of Human Resources, fosters a sense of ownership and enhances team cohesion. This approach aligns with Agile principles of self-management and responsibility.

Get ready for the official PAL I exam
70+ PAL I practice questions, each with an in-depth explanation like the one above.
- Practice Mode: study at your own pace and choose the test length.
- Mock Exam Mode: 36 random questions in 60 minutes, like the real exam.
$29 is ScrumPrep's one-time price. The official PAL I exam fee ($200) is paid separately to Scrum.org.
More PAL I exam questions
- The stakeholders for a new commercial product cannot reach a consensus about what the product should do, or the customers it should satisfy. If you are the Product Owner, what can you do to help the stakeholders reach consensus?
- You manage a product development organization. You attend a Sprint Review for one of the Scrum Teams in your organization. The Product Owner explains that the Developers only delivered 5 of the 7 Product Backlog Items they committed to during Sprint Planning, apologizes on behalf of the team, and promises higher productivity in the next Sprint. What do you think about this?
- You manage a development organization. One of your Scrum Teams is continually interrupted by unplanned work related to production incidents for a legacy application unrelated to their product. A few team members have historical knowledge of the legacy application. How should the Scrum Team manage the interruption and unplanned work?
- You manage a product development organization. Some of your teams determine that they need access to a “production-like” test environment so that they can assess the scalability of their application as they build it. Current processes stipulate that expensive “production-like” test environments are only available as part of final application acceptance testing, just prior to releasing the application to production. Earlier access is not possible because other teams are using the pre-production test environments. Which two of the following strategies would you pursue?
- Who is accountable for ensuring that the product has value for its users/customers?
