The Product Owner should take the performance concern straight to the Developers, work with them on improving it, and use what they learn to strengthen the Definition of Done. Waiting for the Retrospective or pushing it onto testers delays a known problem.
Exam Question
Several Sprints into a project, the Product Owner tells the Scrum Master that a key stakeholder just started using the product. The stakeholder is unhappy with the slow performance, a complaint that the Product Owner agrees on. How will you move this forward? (choose the best answer)
- A. Wait to bring this up in the next Sprint Retrospective as this is the appropriate time for the Scrum Team to re-consider the Definition of Done.
- B. Bring the concern to the testers in the Scrum Team and ask them to improve how the system is tested.
- C. Explain to the Product Owner that it’s up to the Developers to decide on acceptable performance standards as they own the Definition of Done.
- D. Encourage the Product Owner to bring the performance concerns to the Developers and work with them on how to improve performance, and ultimately have stronger Definition of Done.
Correct Answer
D. Encourage the Product Owner to bring the performance concerns to the Developers and work with them, and ultimately have a stronger Definition of Done.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
A stakeholder has inspected the product and found a real quality gap, and the Product Owner agrees. Scrum is built on inspection and adaptation, so the next step is to make the issue transparent to the people who can act on it. The Product Owner and Developers can add performance work to the Product Backlog now, and the Scrum Team can tighten the Definition of Done so future Increments meet the performance level stakeholders need. As Scrum Master, your job is to coach them to collaborate directly, not to carry the message yourself.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
A. Wait for the next Sprint Retrospective. The Retrospective is one place to change the Definition of Done, but nothing stops the team from acting on a known problem today. Waiting adds delay to value the stakeholder is already missing.
B. Ask the testers to improve how the system is tested. Scrum has no separate testers role; quality belongs to all the Developers. Better testing would also only detect slowness, not fix it.
C. Tell the Product Owner the Developers alone decide performance standards. The Scrum Team creates the Definition of Done, and the Product Owner’s view of what stakeholders need is essential input. Shutting the Product Owner out of quality decisions is the opposite of collaboration.
Exam Tip
When an answer has the Scrum Master or the Product Owner talk directly with the Developers to solve a problem now, it usually beats answers that wait for an event or hand the problem to a sub-group.
Key Takeaways
- Quality problems found by stakeholders are fed back immediately.
- The Definition of Done can and should get stronger over time.
- The Scrum Master coaches people to collaborate rather than relaying messages.

Get ready for the official PSM II exam
90 PSM II practice questions, each with an in-depth explanation like the one above.
- Practice Mode: study at your own pace and choose the test length.
- Mock Exam Mode: 30 random questions in 90 minutes, like the real exam.
$29 is ScrumPrep's one-time price. The official PSM II exam fee ($250) is paid separately to Scrum.org.
More PSM II exam questions
- During a Sprint Review, the Product Owner determines that she is going to release the current Increment to production. The stakeholders ask to stop the Sprint to react more quickly to the user feedback that is expected after this release. The Product Owner prefers to continue the Sprint to make progress with the next release. You facilitate a discussion on how to proceed. What are two acceptable results of this discussion?
- Towards the end of the Sprint Planning meeting, the Product Owner and the Developers have not been able to reach a clear, mutual understanding about the highest order Product Backlog items. Because of this, the Developers could not figure out how many Product Backlog items they could forecast for the upcoming Sprint. The Product Owner did make clear what business objective he is hoping to achieve with this Sprint. Which of the following two actions would you support?
- What is the way to determine if the Product Owner is interacting with the Developers enough throughout a Sprint?
- What are two ways in which technical debt relates to velocity?
- A Scrum Team has been working together for nine Sprints. A new Product Owner comes in, unsure about his responsibilities. As the Scrum Master you have observed how the functional and business insights of the Developers have grown over the past Sprints. The Product Owner however is relatively new to the company and to the product. What are two activities you would direct the new Product Owner towards focusing on?
