Suggest coaching the Developers to solve the problem themselves, and coaching the person one-on-one on what the Daily Scrum is for. Escalating to a manager or adding mechanical rules removes ownership from the team.
Exam Question
A Scrum Master colleague of yours wants some guidance on what to do in the following situation. During the Daily Scrum, one Scrum Team member, who is a key central figure in the organization, drags on and on about things which actually are interesting but not relevant for the Daily Scrum, day after day. What are two suggestions you offer the Scrum Master? (choose the best two answers)
- A. You suggest coaching the Developers to help them find a way to solve the problem, and own the solution.
- B. You contact the team member’s Line Manager and raise this as an impediment to the Manager, and ask that they resolve this matter.
- C. You suggest using a timer, to limit the time each person can speak at the Daily Scrum.
- D. You suggest passing a token around. The person holding the token has the floor to speak for an allotted amount of time.
- E. You suggest taking the person aside and asking them what they believe the key outcomes are for the Daily Scrum. Effectively coaching them to help create focus during the Daily Scrum.
Correct Answer
A and E.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
The Developers own their Daily Scrum, so they are best placed to agree how to keep it focused. The Scrum Master serves them by coaching the team members in self-management, which means helping them notice the problem and choose a response they will stick with. A private conversation with the talkative team member respects their standing and helps them see the outcome the event needs: progress toward the Sprint Goal and a plan for the next day. Together these address both the individual and the team. Tools like timers or tokens might appear later, but only if the team chooses them.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
B. Raise it with the person’s line manager as an impediment. This escalates a team issue to someone outside the team and bypasses self-management. It can also damage trust.
C. Impose a timer on each speaker. A timer chosen by the Scrum Master treats the symptom. The team may still not understand the event’s purpose.
D. Pass a token to control who speaks. This is another mechanical fix imposed from outside. It manages turns, not focus on the Sprint Goal.
Exam Tip
In PSM II coaching scenarios, prefer answers that build understanding and team ownership over rules or escalation. Techniques are fine only when the team chooses them.
Key Takeaways
- The Developers own the Daily Scrum and its problems.
- One-on-one coaching can address a single person’s behavior.
- Escalating to line managers undermines self-management.

Get ready for the official PSM II exam
90 PSM II practice questions, each with an in-depth explanation like the one above.
- Practice Mode: study at your own pace and choose the test length.
- Mock Exam Mode: 30 random questions in 90 minutes, like the real exam.
$29 is ScrumPrep's one-time price. The official PSM II exam fee ($250) is paid separately to Scrum.org.
More PSM II exam questions
- In Sprint Planning, the Developers work with the Product Owner to create a forecast for the Sprint. A forecast is a selection of Product Backlog items that the Developers deem feasible to get done by the end of the Sprint. Select two things that explain what “Done” means.
- A few members of the Scrum Team discuss work that is not being done. Some say it is part of the Definition of Done; others say it isn’t. After an hour of angry discussion, someone starts making personal insults and the anger level goes way up. What is the best action for the Scrum Master to take?
- One of the Developers is always missing the Daily Scrum. She feels that as long as he is doing his job well it doesn’t matter whether she attends or not. The other Developers are not doing anything about it. You are the Scrum Master of this team, how would you respond to this situation.
- The relationship between the Product Owner and the Developers has degraded over time.
- You are the Scrum Master of a Scrum Team that has one Developer who disagrees with team decisions. Their disagreements are becoming disruptive and slowing progress. The Developer often returns to earlier team decisions and re-opens the issue.
